Summary

DEI staff and area biologists teamed up over the summer and fall of 2014 and 2015 to conduct a series of comparative, large-scale manipulative experiments at six intertidal mudflats in three geographically distinct coastal regions to examine potential management tools for flats closed for conservation purposes.

The studies, which took place at two flats in Jonesboro, two flats in Boothbay, and one each in  St. George and South Thomaston, were conducted to examine potential management tools for areas closed for conservation purposes that would increase clam harvests. Specifically, the studies examined how the use of plastic predator-deterrent netting (4.2- or 6.4-mm aperture) enhanced: (1) recruitment of 0-class juveniles, (2) survival of 1-year class or greater wild juveniles, and (3) wild stocks using cultured juveniles.

In order to ensure as much confidence in our results as possible, experiments were designed to be statistically valid.  Details about experimental design and results can be found below.

2014

Click here to see Dr. Brian Beal’s 2015 Fishermen’s Forum presentation about this work. This presentation details the six flats the experiments took place in, the experimental design, results of initial baseline clam density and size sampling conducted at each of the six flats, pictures from deployment, final sampling/processing, and results by location. Final sampling took place at the end of October 2014. 

Further information about the 2014 experiments can be found in this final report.

2015

Details about the 2015 experiments, including design, sampling, and results can be found here

Overall Results and Conclusions:

These 12 field trials revealed that:

  1. Indiscriminate placement of nets did not result in consistent enhancement of wild recruits (enhancement only occurred once in 12 trials). 
  2. Survival of greater than or equal to 1-year class individuals was not enhanced in netted versus control plots at any of the six sites in 2014 but occurred in four of six sites in 2015. 
  3. Cultured clam survival (May to October 2015) at the four sites where nets functioned properly varied from 65% to 100% and was independent of aperture size; however, where siltation was heavy or mud snails [Tritia (= Ilyanassaobsoleta] deposited massive numbers of egg capsules on the nets (both scenarios resulting in anoxic conditions in the protected plots), survival ranged from 0% to 48%.

Average annual and wintertime seawater temperatures in the Gulf of Maine have risen gradually during the past two decades, and the warming has been accompanied by increases in clam predators such as the invasive European green crab, Carcinus maenas. Due to the increases in predation and the expected continuation of the warming trend, conservation closures or other large-scale, indirect shellfish management tools cannot be effective in creating new wealth or maintaining jobs associated with the clam fishery in most areas. Therefore, to adapt to changes and increase diversification in the clamming industry in Maine, clammers should be encouraged to protect small (ca. 10 acres) intertidal tracts with netting and other predator-deterrent measures. These smaller tracts of mudflats are easier to routinely maintain than an entire mudflat.

The results of both years of experiments were published in the Journal of Shellfish Research in 2016.

Recommended Posts

Start typing and press Enter to search